Theology

Martin Luther on the Lord's Supper

(just a few thoughts from one of my former classes at Liberty University) Martin Luther was the great leader of the Reformation. He was born November 10, 1483 in Eisleben Germany.  He was baptized as a Roman Catholic at birth. Martin Luther was the eldest of seven children in a middle-class German peasant family. At 21, Luther earned a Master of Arts degree from the University of Erfurt. Hans Luther was determined that his son be well-educated, and his hard work in the copper mines financed the younger Luther's education. Through Luther’s hard work he began to understand the need to know scripture and what it meant. Luther understood righteousness as a gift of God’s grace. He has discovered or (recovered) the doctrine of justification by grace alone. This discovery set him on fire. In 1517, he posted a sheet of theses for discussion on the University’s chapel door. These ninety-five theses set out a devastating critique of the church’s sale of indulgences and explained the fundamentals of justification by grace alone. Luther’s work left a huge impact on Christianity today.

The Lord’s Supper is an important aspect of Christianity that needs to be clearly communicated to today’s culture. Luther’s article begins explaining the papacy changing the mode and meaning of the Lord’s Supper from the early church. In relation to the papists, they believed they had the right to change what the Lord’s Supper meant. The reality of man-made tradition was seen in the time of Luther. Men felt they had the ability to do a better job than God and create their own commandments. Luther vehemently opposes the papacy to be elevated to the point of being equal to God’s authority.

Luther mentions the importance of the time the Lord Supper is being given. He comments, “although they may be understood as fulfilled on the cross; it matter not that Christ says: "Which is given for you.” He speaks to the truth of Christ accomplishing salvation for man, past, present and future. We are not bound to laws for salvation, but by grace through faith alone. Luther calls what the papists refer to as transubstantiation, to be incorrect and not biblical. He points to it be idolatry to point to the bread and wine as being the actual body and blood of Jesus Christ. Jesus died once and for all for the sins of mankind.

The great message that Luther preached was that Christ is the only avenue to God. No longer did people have to confess to a priest, but go straight to God through Christ. This teaching and revolution that Luther began was one of the most monumental parts of Christian History. Luther believed in the authority of scripture and his legacy has helped us today in elevating what God thinks over man’s ideas.

What does it mean to be "In Christ?"

Paul’s background reveals that he had many degrees and training in Jewish law. Understanding his background of being a top Pharisee speaks of his undying devotion to the Torah and living it out.

Knowing that, it is important to note that Paul’s conversion and his writings of Jesus fulfilling the law and being the sacrifice for all mankind is a great example of what it means to be “in Christ.” Paul’s reminder of being “in Christ” speaks of the forgiveness he found in his relationship with Christ from all of the persecution and pain that he caused the early church before his conversion. Paul’s example of being in Christ also points to all men being in unity through a relationship with Christ. We are a spiritual family through the death and resurrection of Christ over sin. Every person who believes in Christ alone for salvation is brought near (Acts. 2:39) to God.

The atoning death of Christ on the cross washes away the penalty of sin and leads us into a pure relationship with God. Not only our lives spiritually but on the outward when it comes to different people (race, background). Reconciliation is the key that Paul reminds believers in Ephesians 2:13-16.  The barrier has been broken down points to the temple wall that was partitioned off the gentiles from the area that was only exclusively accessible by the Jews. Paul refers to the “wall as symbolic of social, religious, and spiritual separation that the Gentiles and Jews were a part of in the early church days."

Paul was able to find his theology through knowing and growing closer to the Jesus. Paul was able to see God change him through the “Damascus road experience” and to see God’s provision and deliverance and grace was greatly seen in Paul’s ministry. He was truly a “new creation” and was used greatly by God.

3 Promises of being in Christ:

1.   Unconditionally loved by God

“How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! And that is what we are!” (1 John 3:1a)

2. Absolutely accepted through Christ.

 “But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.” 1 Peter 2:9

3.    Made whole through a relationship with Christ. (v.17b)

The term “In Christ” refers also to “Christ in us” and the transformation that He does in a believer’s life.

The way that a non-believer would understand being “in Christ” would be that Jesus is the complete “boss” of your life and all of who you are is found in a relationship with Him. The person needs to know that faith in Christ alone for salvation is how a person comes into beginning a relationship with God. A relationship with Christ pictures a person coming “home” and is made a son/daughter of God through the forgiveness they find in Christ.

The Quest for the Historical Jesus

The historical quest for Jesus has been an ongoing battle throughout history. Christian’s faith should not be just a belief without evidence for the historical Jesus. The quest for Jesus has been an interest for many people, Christian and non-Christian. The historical information of the past will show that Jesus is the true Messiah. The first quest is the historical accounts of Jesus and how it correlates to the Biblical accounts of Jesus. Rationalists believe that not all that the Bible records actually happened. This belief is a way of rejecting any form of supernatural, but using just a rational viewpoint about the life of Jesus. “The first quest had traveled the road of rationalistic historical study and had come to a dead end.[1] The Jewish background of Jesus and the accounts of the gospels are historically and culturally correct. The Dead Sea scrolls are an example of the relevant archeological findings proving that the Biblical account of Jesus is true.

The quest for Jesus must start with the very year of His birth. It was at the time of King Herod and Luke accounts that Jesus was born soon after John the Baptist. Historical fact shows the Matthew account to be accurate about Herod’s murderous reign. The start and length of Jesus’ ministry has also been a debate. His ministry started after John the Baptist, but there is some debate upon the calendar formulation and how it all came about. Determining the length of Jesus’ ministry depends upon the information in the gospel of John. Another question arises, whether the date of Jesus’ ministry and death in John 2:20 about the temple and its construction. Although there are competing dates, there is not dispute about the historical placement of Jesus’ ministry.

Evidence for Jesus’ life from Roman sources include: Suetonius Claudius, Tacitus Annals, and Pliny the Younger[2]. All of these had accounts of Jesus’ life and recorded it to prove that Jesus was who the Bible says He is. Most were history of Rome and how Jesus was mentioned in all their reports. The most powerful extra biblical writer is Flavius Josephus as a historian. He traced Jewish history and closely followed their history and Jesus outside of the Bible. He recorded that Jesus was crucified by Pontius Pilate and how many people followed Him and became His followers.

The crucifixion and death of Jesus is an undisputed fact of history. The resurrection is a happening that is in debate. Early Christians believed that Jesus died and one the third rose again. No person has ever produced a naturalistic explanation of what happened after the crucifixion that accounts for all the facts, but there is no other evidence that Jesus did not revive from the dead. The historical Jesus found in the gospels has to be the Jesus that Christians worship because God’s Word is inspired, but Jesus is inseparable from the Bible.

The historical quest for Jesus stands upon an important issue, our basis for life and ministry as a Christian. Jesus is the basis that includes the historical and biblical accounts of His life. They are not separate parts, but are inseparable in understanding and believing Jesus who lives in Heaven and the man who walked the earth. The influence of beliefs on Jesus covers every theological topic. Jesus came and walked the earth, lived a sinless life and resurrected from the dead. Historical fact, archeological evidence, and firsthand accounts contribute to the truth of Jesus Christ. Not only is historical facts about Jesus true, but He is truth. Historical fact proves that Jesus came, lived, died, and resurrected into Heaven. Biblical accounts show the Jesus that took the sin of the world upon Himself and paid in full our debt for salvation. The quest leads us to a sinless Savior that is alive and sitting at God’s right hand in Heaven.


[1]Studying the Historical Jesus – A Guide to sources and methods. Darrel L. Bock (Page144)

[2] Studying the Historical Jesus – A Guide to sources and methods. Darrel L. Bock (pages 47-54)